Christensen Group Insurance Article

Connect with us
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Search
August 20, 2021

Paying plan expenses with plan assets

Dereck Mattson joined Christensen Group in 2017. Previously, Dereck held the position of Producer in the Senior Living Division of a prominent insurance company. Dereck has a specific focus in the following industries: Dereck graduated from the University of North Dakota with a Bachelor of Business Administration, Management. He holds an Associate in General Insurance (AINS) designation. Dereck is involved with several state associations including; LeadingAge Minnesota, Care Providers of Minnesota, and the Wisconsin Assisted Living Association (WALA).

Some retirement plan expenses can be paid for with plan assets — but many can’t. Which are the “reasonable and necessary” retirement plan expenses that can be paid out of plan assets?

 Generally, services required to maintain the plan’s compliance and administration can be paid from plan assets. Obvious examples include the annual nondiscrimination testing and preparation of the annual Form 5500. Another example is a plan amendment or restatement that is required because a legislative change.

 Optional services generally cannot be paid out of plan assets. One clear example is costs for projections that are optional and benefit the company, not the plan participants.

 Some service fees may not be easy to classify. Fees for resolving plan corrections —such as delinquent deferral remittances or contributions determined with a definition of compensation not supported in your plan document. In the event of an incorrect test result, regardless of who was at fault, the law ultimately holds the plan sponsor responsible for the proper maintenance of the plan. As a result, the plan sponsor cannot shift the financial burden for the corrections to the plan.

 All in all, it’s perfectly acceptable and common to charge reasonable and necessary transaction-based and recordkeeper administrative fees to participants. However, it is critical to ensure that similarly situated participants are treated the same. It would be discriminatory and, therefore not allowed, for non-highly compensated employees to pay administrative fees while highly compensated employees did not.

Get the latest insurance articles sent to your inbox

Stay up-to-date with our latest insurance news and information.

Speak with an insurance expert.

Talk with us today