Christensen Group Insurance Article

Connect with us
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Search
June 5, 2026

Employees on leave: Maintain health coverage and avoid compliance mistakes

A common question that employers have when an employee takes a leave of absence is whether the employee remains eligible for group health plan coverage. The answer depends on several factors, including whether the leave qualifies for protection under federal, state, or local law. For example, the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) requires covered employers to maintain health plan coverage for employees taking FMLA leave on the same basis as if they had remained working during the entire leave period.

In addition, a health plan’s eligibility rules may include minimum service requirements for eligibility. When an employee goes out on leave and their hours fall below that threshold, they may technically lose eligibility under the plan’s terms. Employers should review their plan documents carefully to understand how coverage is affected when an employee takes leave. Applicable large employers (ALEs) should also consider how an employee’s leave impacts full-time employee status and their corresponding coverage obligations under the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) employer shared responsibility, or “pay-or-play” rules.

Employers may choose to offer health plan coverage during leave that goes beyond what the law requires. Any such policies should be clearly documented, applied consistently, and approved in advance by the plan’s health insurance issuer or stop-loss carrier to help avoid unintended liability.

Health plan eligibility during leave

Whether an employee remains eligible for health plan coverage during a leave of absence depends mainly on the following three factors:

  • Whether the leave is protected under federal, state, or local law
  • The health plan’s eligibility rules, as described in the official plan document
  • The employer’s own leave policies

If an employee on leave is no longer eligible for health coverage, the employer should terminate active coverage and offer continuation coverage (if applicable) under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) or state continuation laws. Continuing to offer active coverage to ineligible employees can create significant risk for the employer. Issuers and stop-loss carriers may refuse to cover claims for employees who were not actually eligible under the plan’s terms, leaving the employer potentially responsible for those costs. Employers may also face penalties for failing to properly administer COBRA.

{{cta-employee-benefits="/components/rich-text-cta"}}

On a related note, nondiscrimination rules under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) generally prohibit health plans from imposing “actively at work” or continuous-service requirements for employees who take leave before their health plan coverage begins. Under HIPAA, employers may not delay enrollment in the health plan until an employee is actively at work or completes a period of continuous service, unless individuals who are absent from work due to any health factor are treated, for purposes of health coverage, as being at work.

Protected leave

Protected leave is time away from work that is covered by federal, state, or local law. Employees on protected leave generally retain certain rights during their absence, such as job protection, continued benefits, and the right to be reinstated when they return. Common examples include the FMLA leave, military leave, and state medical and family leave. While employers can allow employees to take leave for other reasons (e.g., personal leave or educational leave), this type of leave is generally considered unprotected because it is not covered by law.

Employees who take a protected leave may be entitled to retain their eligibility for health plan coverage, depending on the leave law’s specific requirements. At the federal level, there are three main laws providing protected leave, as summarized below.

State and local laws may provide leave rights that differ from, or go beyond, what federal law requires. Most states have their own family and medical leave laws, and many provide leave rights for other circumstances, such as bereavement or civic duties. Employers should be familiar with the leave laws in each location where their employees work and evaluate whether those laws offer any benefit protections beyond what federal law requires.

In general, employers are not required by law to maintain an employee’s health benefits during a leave that is not covered by federal, state or local law (i.e., an unprotected leave). Whether an employee on unprotected leave remains eligible for health coverage generally depends on the health plan’s written terms and the employer’s leave policies.

Health plan terms and leave policies

When an employer is not required by law to maintain health plan coverage for an employee on leave, it should consider how the plan’s written terms define eligibility for coverage. Employer-sponsored health plans typically include minimum service requirements for eligibility. For example, many health plans require employees to work an average of at least 30 hours per week to remain eligible for coverage. When an employee goes on leave and their hours fall below that threshold, they may lose eligibility under the plan’s terms. As summarized below, ALEs should consider how an employee’s leave impacts their coverage obligations under the ACA’s pay-or-play rules.

In the absence of any legal obligation or specific language in the plan documents, employers should review their leave policies to determine how long an employee on an unprotected leave remains eligible for benefits. These policies should be clearly written and applied consistently across similarly situated employees to help guard against discrimination claims. Also, employers that extend health coverage for employees on unprotected leave should confirm these eligibility rules with their issuers or stop-loss carriers in advance. This helps to protect the employer from inadvertently assuming liability for claims payments.

Paying for coverage during leave

Most employers allow employees to pay for their share of health plan premiums on a pre-tax basis through a Section 125 cafeteria plan. When an employee’s leave is paid through payroll, employee contributions can continue to be deducted from their pay as usual. However, if the leave is unpaid (or paid through an outside source), employers should ensure they have a process for employees to make contributions for their health coverage.

IRS regulations for cafeteria plans provide three options for paying health plan premiums during an unpaid FMLA leave, as outlined below. A cafeteria plan may allow one or more of these options, subject to certain limitations. In general, whatever payment options are offered to employees on non-FMLA leave must be offered to employees on FMLA leave.

  • Prepay option: Employees are given the opportunity to pay their share of premiums before their leave begins, covering contributions that would otherwise come due during the leave period. To do this, employees voluntarily reduce their pay prior to starting leave to cover their share of premiums for all or part of the expected leave period. This cannot be the only payment option offered to employees on FMLA leave; however, this payment option may be limited exclusively to employees taking FMLA leave. Prepaying for coverage on a pretax basis is not allowed when the leave of absence spans two plan years.
  • Pay-as-you-go option: Employees pay their share of premiums in installments throughout the leave period. These contributions can be made with pre-tax dollars to the extent the employee receives any compensation during the leave period, such as paid time off or sick pay. Otherwise, the contributions can be made on an after-tax basis (e.g., by mailing a personal check).
  • Catch-up option: The employer advances the employee’s share of premium costs during the leave, with the employee’s agreement to repay those amounts upon returning to work. Once the employee returns, they make special catch-up salary-reduction contributions to reimburse the employer for the premiums that were advanced on their behalf during the leave. This can be the sole option offered to employees on FMLA leave only if it is the sole option offered under other types of unpaid leave.

ACA’s pay-or-play rules

The ACA’s pay-or-play rules require ALEs to offer affordable, minimum-value health coverage to their full-time employees (and dependents) or potentially pay a penalty to the IRS. An ALE is an employer that averaged at least 50 full-time employees, including full-time equivalent employees, during the preceding calendar year. A full-time employee is an employee who was employed, on average, at least 30 hours of service per week (or 130 hours in a calendar month).

The following two methods are available for determining full-time employee status:

  • Monthly measurement method: This method involves a month-to-month analysis, where full-time employees are identified based on their hours of service for each calendar month.
  • Look-back measurement method: Under this method, an ALE counts an employee’s hours of service during one period (called a measurement period) to determine their full-time status for a future period (called a stability period). While the details of this method are complicated, it provides predictability for companies that have employees with varying hours or work schedules.

The obligation to offer health coverage to full-time employees becomes more complex when an employee goes on leave. To avoid potential penalties, ALEs should ensure that they understand how a leave affects an employee’s hours of service and their full-time employee status under the pay-or-play rules.

To determine if employees meet the ACA’s threshold for full-time status (i.e., 30 hours of service per week), an ALE must count each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, for the performance of duties, as well as each hour for which an employee is paid or entitled to payment for a period of time during which no duties are performed due to vacation, holiday, illness, incapacity, layoff, jury duty, military duty or leave of absence. This means that paid leave generally counts toward an employee’s hours-of-service total, which can affect their full-time status determination.

The look-back measurement method has rules for calculating hours during certain periods of unpaid leave. During a measurement period, ALEs must average hours during “special unpaid leave periods,” which include leave under the FMLA, USERRA or jury duty. Under the averaging method, ALEs can either:

  • Determine the average hours of service per week for the employee during the measurement period, excluding the special unpaid leave period, and use that average as the average for the entire measurement period.
  • Treat employees as being credited with hours of service for special unpaid leave at a rate equal to the average weekly rate at which the employee was credited with hours of service during the weeks in the measurement period that are not special unpaid leave.

Also, under the look-back measurement method, an employee generally retains their full-time (or non-full-time)status during the entire stability period, regardless of their hours of service during the stability period, so long as they remain an employee of the ALE. Thus, to avoid potential penalties, an ALE should maintain health coverage for full-time employees during a stability period, even if they take an unprotected leave of absence during that period.

Links and resources

This Compliance Overview is not intended to be exhaustive, nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel for legal advice. ©2026 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved.

Get the latest insurance articles sent to your inbox

Stay up-to-date with our latest insurance news and information.

Speak with an insurance expert.

Talk with us today